Senior Medical Reviewer
About this opportunity
Job Purpose
Responsible for supporting the Pfizer Research & Development group Medical Information and Review, specifically:
Working collaboratively with Medical and Marketing teams to review promotional, training and continuing medical education material in compliance with relevant SOPs/ regulations/ industry codes/ working practices
Advocating best practices for achieving effective and complaint medical and promotional communications for Pfizer products
Under supervision from line manager, ensuring that the operational deliverables of assigned deliverables are achieved on or ahead of schedule and within standards such that they meet the desired outcomes (i.e. quality standard, value)
Main Responsibilities
Technical
Uses scientific expertise and medical knowledge to ensure appropriate review of promotional, regulatory, training and continuing medical education material in compliance with relevant SOPs/ regulations/ industry codes/ working practices
Liaises with all commercial functions in the review for scientific/ medical accuracy prior to and through the MLR review process as required
Ensuring clear, factual, effective, and appropriately concise presentation of analyses and associated discussions in assigned documents.
Collaborating with other lines and relevant project team subject matter experts, ensuring the accuracy and quality of information presented in assigned documents
Assists in generating and reviewing any additional support content, including proof reading, reviewing, referencing and verifying anti-plagiarism of the content
Tactical/ Operational
Maintains the promotional material review process and system knowledge as per Pfizer standards
Produces analytics reports and project scorecards as required in line with decided KPIs and sharing these with the line manager
Monitors milestones, identifing potential risks and assisting in resolving any issues
Assists in coordinating activities of other team members to ensure the quality and accuracy of their contributions
Conducts quality control assessments of assigned deliverables as required
Project Planning, Execution and Delivery
Prioritizes and multitasks to enhance productivity and manage workload
Under supervision from line manager, communicates with stakeholders regarding project progress to cross functional teams and ensuring that quality standards are being met and to optimize efficiency
Delivers assigned documents on or before deadline, alerting project teams in a timely manner of any anticipated delays, information gaps or potential shortcomings in quality
Others
Mentorship – actively mentors other team members for effective execution of assigned tasks and goals Keeps abreast of current literature, emerging science, technological developments and medical trends for enhancing content review and development Values and Behaviors - Consistently adheres to/demonstrates all Pfizer values, with special focus on integrity, performance and teamwork. Works in harmony with internal and external stakeholders Personal Development - Enhances self-development through on-the-job training. In consultation with line manager, identifies additional areas of interest towards learning and development, along with training needs and gaps. Performance Management System (PMS) – Ensures full compliance to PMS
Qualification & Experience
Post-graduate degree in Pharmaceutical Science or graduate in Medical science (MBBS)
Prior work experience as a member of Promotional and more medical/ scientific material review team
Special Skills & Knowledge
Technical skills: Knowledge of “pharmaceutical medicine” including clinical pharmacology, medical and paramedical sciences, medicine and medical statistics, and relevant Therapeutic Area/Products
Writing skills: Excellent writing skills
Analytic skills: Ability to examine data, formulate reasonable hypotheses, and design and execute analyses to test them. Analytical skills and reasoning, and sound medical judgment/decision making
Language skill: High fluency in written English and strong functional fluency in spoken English.
Personal skills. Strong organizational skills and ability to prioritize multiple projects and meet deadlines.
Interpersonal skills: Effective influencing and negotiating skills, including when appropriate an ability to guide decision-making for document content strategy. Ability to work well with all levels and roles in cross-functional, global teams.
Regulatory knowledge: Familiarity with global regulatory guidance (especially ICH, FDA and EMA) relevant to clinical and safety data.
Software: Previous experience with software commonly used to present and analyze data and experience with searching academic databases. (Word, PowerPoint, Excel) is preferred. Working knowledge of tools to aid the promotional material review process (GCMA) is required.
Pfizer is an equal opportunity employer and complies with all applicable equal employment opportunity legislation in each jurisdiction in which it operates.
To learn more about acceptable and prohibited uses of AI during the recruitment process, please review our candidate AI-use guidelines available on Pfizer Careers .

Medical
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 140 comparable Senior Medical Affairs roles across 44 biopharma companies.
Salary context
37 of 140 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 140 comparable roles
+ 12 more countries
Seniority mix
140 of 140 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
61 of 140 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.