Medical Science Liaison, ILD (Bangkok, Thailand, Amnat Charoen)
About this opportunity
THE POSITION
Build trusted partnerships with external stakeholders by driving peer-to-peer exchange of knowledge and improving disease awareness/understanding (in alignment with therapeutic-area/asset strategy) to facilitate appropriate patient-management decisions
From the clinical development phase onwards, inform strategic decisions, support organizational goals, and help improve patient care, by developing a deep understanding of the therapeutic area and healthcare landscape (including stakeholder networks and patient care pathways), and gathering actionable insights
Identify the needs of external stakeholders, recognize opportunities for healthcare solutions and data-generation, and proactively address the needs by collaborating with internal stakeholders and leveraging external partnerships
Tasks & Responsibilities
Responsible for engagement of external experts and scientific and clinical exchange between BI and HCPs to build the understanding and the value to clinical practice of BI products aligned with scientific objectives in Integrated Customer Planning (ICP)
Responsible for documenting scientific interactions between BI and HCPs and for sharing respective information to the brand team
Execute medical projects or Boehringer-initiated activities such as medical education, round-table discussions, advisory boards, publications, and congress activities.
Provides and delivers important information to HCPs about the appropriate use of BI products.
Responsible for execution of advocacy development plans and support execution of medical affairs activities based on ICP in collaboration with brand team
May initiate interaction with EE/HCP when BI needs to gain insight or to gather specific feedback to guide internal decision-making (perception tracking/ treatment landscape)
Provides formal medical/scientific information to HCPs in response to unsolicited requests with appropriate information
Requirements
Bachelors in the field of life/health science or other Medicine-related discipline. Possessing an advanced degree (e.g., MD, PhD, MSc) will be an advantage
A minimum of 3 years' experience in the pharmaceutical industry, especially in Medical Affairs, is preferred
Outstanding communication and presentation skills, capable of conveying complex scientific information with confidence and clarity to diverse stakeholders.
The potential to think strategically, connecting scientific data to broader business, regulatory, and market access objectives
Good interpersonal skills
Proficiency for English in professional level and fluent in Thai are required
]]>
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 924 comparable Medical Affairs roles across 130 biopharma companies.
Salary context
175 of 924 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 924 comparable roles
+ 52 more countries
Seniority mix
502 of 924 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
326 of 924 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.