Director, Study Quality and Compliance - Nonclinical Safety/Toxicology
About this opportunity
Location: Cambridge MAInternal: DirectorLI#-HybridThis role oversees the Study Quality and Compliance team within the Toxicology line function of Preclinical Safety (PCS). This team is responsible for: handling samples and data associated with both internally and externally conducted toxicology studies; maintaining departmental SOPs, and oversight of training records for departmental personnel; and interfacing with the archives function to ensure proper storage of toxicology-related materials and records. A major part of this role will be to identify and implement a software system that enables effective tracking and analytics of study-related information that this group is responsible for overseeing.
Key Responsibilities: Lead and provide strategic oversight to the PCS Study Quality and Compliance team including responsibility for establishing long-term strategy and yearly goals which support itModernize the group functionality leading the implementation of tracking, management, and data analytics software (eg, Smartsheet) across the toxicology line function to enhance quality and compliance oversight of toxicology studiesOversight of toxicology study data management from external and internal studies; this includes data suitability and availability for our internal toxicology study data warehouseOversight and responsibility for ensuring SEND (Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical data) datasets are of high-quality and are ready in a timely manner for regulatory submissions, which includes SEND datasets from external CRO and de novo generation for internal non-GLP studiesOversight of SOPs and training records for PCS personnel to ensure compliance with GLP expectations, and serve as the management interface with the Archive Records Management teamOversight of support for biomarker and pathology with respect to shipment of study samples and data transfer of digital slidesSupport diligence acquisition and licensing deals through oversight and management of study-related data (including SEND) that need to be transferredEssential Requirements: Advanced degree in biological-related sciences with at least 10 years of relevant pharmaceutical experience, or BS degree in biological-related science with 15 years of experiencePrevious experience working with GLP guidelines and pharmaceutical toxicology studies, and associated quality, compliance, and animal welfare attributesPrevious people management or leadership experienceGood communication skills, and excellent logistical/planning skillsFluent in English (spoken and written)Desirable Requirements: Previous experience with software tools for data and/or program management is highly desiredPrevious experience with SEND, or at a minimum good general familiarity with its requirements is desiredThe salary for this position is expected to range between: $185,500 and $344,500 per year.The final salary offered is determined based on factors like, but not limited to, relevant skills and experience, and upon joining Novartis will be reviewed periodically. Novartis may change the published salary range based on company and market factors. Your compensation will include a performance-based cash incentive and, depending on the level of the role, eligibility to be considered for annual equity awards.US-based eligible employees will receive a comprehensive benefits package that includes health, life and disability benefits, a 401(k) with company contribution and match, and a variety of other benefits. In addition, employees are eligible for a generous time off package including vacation, personal days, holidays and other leaves.To learn more about the culture, rewards and benefits we offer our people click here.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Quality role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 44 comparable Director Quality roles across 15 biopharma companies.
Salary context
23 of 44 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 44 comparable roles
+ 4 more countries
Seniority mix
44 of 44 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
0 of 44 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
No peers with a known therapeutic area yet.
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.