Director, Policy
About this opportunity
Organize Novartis Japan’s policy issues, including geo-policy and trade policy and promote Public Policy Engagement (PPE) activities in Japan. Develop policy narrative for Novartis Japan by aligning with CLT and relevant functions (Country president, Head of PA, V&A and Development etc.) about the policy issues that should be prioritize in the activities of trade associations, such as PhRMA, EFPIA and JPMA. Also, collaborate with Comms & Patient Advocacy to communicate and engage with external stakeholders.
Job Responsibilities:Lead geopolitical and trade policy analysis and development of policy narrative to leverage business while collaborating with Global Public AffairsGather and analyze geopolitical information to maximize Novartis business opportunities in JapanIdentify prioritized policy issues to be addressed by Novartis Japan in collaboration with relevant functions (V&A, Development, Com & PtA and Regulatory Affairs etc.), develop and execute PPE strategies and action plans while aligning with CLTOversee Novartis' trade association activities among functions and develop company strategies, policy narrative and action plansDevelop Novartis policy narrative with V&A, Policy Comms and other relevant functions.Develop stakeholder mapping for policy activities and lead maintain the relationship with policy stakeholdersBased on the priority of Japan Public Affairs, conduct PPE activities appropriately in compliance with local regulations and Novartis internal rules Ideal Background:Education:Bachelor’s degree or higher preferably (Ph.D) in Business management, Public Policy, Medical Sciences, Biology or science. Skills and Experience:Language: Japanese (Native) & English (Business)Develop materials to complex issues to government and NVS executives (Word, PPT, and ECXCEL)Proactive and solutions-oriented leadership of cross-functional and external partnerships that require leading without authority and adept management of complex stakeholder relationshipsStrong understanding of the policy-making process in Japan and trade association activitiesStrong strategic mindset and experience processing new insights, external data, and complex information to not only maximize existing programs, but support the creation of alternative strategic approaches and systemsDemonstrated project management skills, including prioritizing tasks, leading cross-functional stakeholders across a matrixed organization, and removing barriers to successfully lead and deliver on complex projectsExcellent communication and interpersonal skills with the ability to build, problem solve, and maintain relationships with diverse stakeholdersKnowledge of relevant regulations and guidelines related to public policy engagementCollaborative and team-oriented ways of working required(Must) At least 5 years experience in Public Affairs and Government Affairs in healthcare industry(Must)Experience in advocacy and lobbying for policy stakeholders(Preferable) Consulting & Government Official background
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Communications & Public Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 14 comparable Director Communications & Public Affairs roles across 10 biopharma companies.
Salary context
6 of 14 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 14 comparable roles
Seniority mix
14 of 14 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
1 of 14 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.