Clinical Study Administrator
About this opportunity
Estudio Local (LST) para garantizar la calidad y consistencia de los entregables del estudio intervencionista a los objetivos de tiempo, costo y calidad. (5 a 7 proyectos en donde da soporte administrativo con mucha responsabilidad sobre la documentación regulatoria y centros de investigación que deben archivarse)
Responsabilidades
Asiste en la coordinación y administración de estudios clínicos desde la puesta en marcha hasta la ejecución y el cierre.
Recopila, ayuda en la preparación, revisa y rastrea documentos para el proceso de solicitud. Ayuda en la presentación oportuna de la solicitud / documentos adecuados a EC / IRB y, cuando corresponda, a las autoridades reguladoras durante la duración del estudio.
Interfaces con investigadores, proveedores de servicios externos y CRA durante el proceso de recopilación de documentos para apoyar la entrega efectiva de un estudio y sus documentos.
Responsabilidad operativa para la correcta configuración y mantenimiento del eTMF local y el ISF, incluido el seguimiento de documentos de acuerdo con ICH-GCP y los requisitos locales hasta su cierre.
Asegura que todos los documentos del estudio estén listos para el archivo final y la finalización de la parte local del eTMF y apoya a la CRA en las actividades de cierre para el ISF.
Contribuye a la producción y mantenimiento de documentos de estudio, asegurando el cumplimiento de plantillas y versiones.
Crea y/o importa documentos clínico-regulatorios en el Sistema Global de Gestión Electrónica (por ejemplo, ANGEL)
Contribuye a las solicitudes / presentaciones electrónicas mediante el manejo de documentos clínico-regulatorios de acuerdo con los estándares técnicos solicitados, es decir, Los Estándares listos para la presentación (SRS), lo que respalda la publicación y entrega efectivas a las autoridades reguladoras.
Requisitos
Titulo Universitario en Biología, Bioquímica, Farmacia, Nutrición, Biotecnología u otras carreras vinculadas a la salud.
Experiencia en Investigación Clínica o curso en Investigación (Excluyente).
Posibilidad de permanecer en el rol al menos 2 años.
Date Posted
16-jun-2026
Closing Date
31-ago-2026
AstraZeneca embraces diversity and equality of opportunity. We are committed to building an inclusive and diverse team representing all backgrounds, with as wide a range of perspectives as possible, and harnessing industry-leading skills. We believe that the more inclusive we are, the better our work will be. We welcome and consider applications to join our team from all qualified candidates, regardless of their characteristics. We comply with all applicable laws and regulations on non-discrimination in employment (and recruitment), as well as work authorization and employment eligibility verification requirements.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 709 comparable Clinical Development roles across 70 biopharma companies.
Salary context
218 of 709 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 709 comparable roles
+ 30 more countries
Seniority mix
577 of 709 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
154 of 709 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.