AstraZeneca Posted June 25, 2026

Associate Director, Clinical Research

Da'an Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan Full time
Clinical Development Associate Director

AstraZeneca is the source of truth for this posting and owns the application process. We surface normalized context and market comparison you won't find on the original listing.

About this opportunity

The Associate Director Clinical Research (ADCR) is responsible for delivering the committed part of all clinical interventional studies under their supervision according to agreed resources, and timelines complying with AZ Procedural Documents, international guidelines such as ICH-GCP as well as relevant local regulations.

The ADCR is responsible for line managing dedicated group(s) of staff such as Clinical Research Associates (CRAs) and/or Clinical Study Administrators (CSAs) and is responsible for planning and utilization of staff resources, objective setting and performance follow-up.

As assigned, the ADCR is responsible for ensuring that study sites are identified, site qualifications performed, set up, initiated, monitored, closed and documentation archived, as agreed locally.

In some countries a ADCR may also take responsibilities as Local Study Associate Director (LSAD) if required and agreed with the (Senior) Director, Country Head.

Accountabilities

Leadership of dedicated group, building the team spirit, developing team style and behaviour.

Ensures adequate resources for the studies assigned.

Ensures that the workload of direct reports is adequate.

Development and performance management of direct reports.

Ensures that direct reports have development and training plans, according to IDP process.

Coaches the direct reports on a regular basis, and plans/organises coaching with external providers if needed.

Prepares salary and bonus proposals for direct reports based on their performance in close collaboration with responsible (Senior) Director, Country Head and local HRBP.

Contributes to efficient SMM organisation and its functioning at country level by working closely with responsible (Senior) Director, Country Head.

Contributes to high quality feasibility work.

Supports successful delivery of SMM study delivery country level targets to plan, with speed and quality.

Contributes to the quality improvement of the study processes and other procedures.

Ensures all systems are continuously updated.

Ensures completeness and timeliness of the eTMF to maintain it “Inspection Ready”.

Provides direction to CRAs and CSAs on major study commitments including resolving any key issues identified.

Ensures that study activities at country level comply with local policies and code of ethics.

Reviews monitoring visit reports of direct reports in line with AZ SOPs

Reviews Accompanied site visits/co- monitoring visits/training visits/QC visits performed to direct reports in line with the local QC plans.

Performs accompanied site visits according to local QC Plan, supporting ongoing coaching and development. Ongoing communication with Functional Service Providers, including directions and feedback on insourced/outsourced work

If ADCR takes a role as LSAD, please refer to the corresponding Job description .

Qualifications

Bachelor degree in related discipline, preferably in life science, or equivalent qualification.

Minimum 4 years of experience in Development Operations (CRA / SrCRA / LSAD) or other related fields.

Excellent interpersonal skills.

Manage change with a positive approach for self, team and business. Sees change as an opportunity to improve performance and add value to business.

Project management experience.

Excellent organisational, analytical, influencing and negotiation skills.

Excellent presentation and communication skills, verbal and written.

Excellent knowledge of spoken and written English.

Good ability to learn and to adapt to work with IT systems.

Ability for national travel, if applicable.

Date Posted

25-Jun-2026

Closing Date

30-Oct-2026

AstraZeneca embraces diversity and equality of opportunity.  We are committed to building an inclusive and diverse team representing all backgrounds, with as wide a range of perspectives as possible, and harnessing industry-leading skills.  We believe that the more inclusive we are, the better our work will be.  We welcome and consider applications to join our team from all qualified candidates, regardless of their characteristics.  We comply with all applicable laws and regulations on non-discrimination in employment (and recruitment), as well as work authorization and employment eligibility verification requirements.

Job details

Seniority
Associate Director
Function
Clinical Development
Therapeutic area
Not listed
Location
Da'an Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan
Employment type
Full time

How this role compares

Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.

We currently track 309 comparable Associate Director Clinical Development roles across 48 biopharma companies.

309Comparable roles tracked
273Currently active
48Companies hiring similar roles
28Countries represented

Salary context

66 of 309 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)

Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.

This roleSubject Not listed on this posting
Peer group range $90,199 – $315,000 (median $180,250)

Where these roles are based

Top locations among the 309 comparable roles

United States107
India87
China13
Poland11
United Kingdom11
Spain9

+ 22 more countries

Seniority mix

309 of 309 peers have a known seniority level

Manager146
Senior91
Associate Director72

Therapeutic area mix

24 of 309 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden

Oncology9
Immunology6
Cardiovascular / CVRM4
Neuroscience3
Dermatology & Aesthetics1
Ophthalmology1

Similar opportunities

The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.

60%similar
Amgen Inc. Taipei City, Taiwan Associate Director
Same function Same seniority Same country
50%similar
Lilly Taipei City, Taipei City, Taiwan Manager
Same function Adjacent seniority Same country
50%similar
Amgen Inc. Taipei City, Taiwan Manager
Same function Adjacent seniority Same country
50%similar
Amgen Taiwan Limited Taipei City, Taiwan Manager
Same function Adjacent seniority Same country
50%similar
Amgen Taiwan Limited Taipei City, Taiwan Senior
Same function Adjacent seniority Same country
45%similar
AstraZeneca Seoul, Korea, Korea, Republic of Associate Director
Same function Same seniority

How we calculate "similar"

No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.

Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.

60%
Associate Director Biostatistics
Amgen Inc. · Taipei City, Taiwan · Associate Director
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
50%
LSOM Line Manager (Local Study Operations Line Manager)
Amgen Taiwan Limited · Taipei City, Taiwan · Manager
Function Therapeutic area Adjacent seniority Country
45%
Associate Director Clinical Research, Country Feasibility Lead (SMM Biopharmaceuticals)
AstraZeneca · Seoul, Korea, Korea, Republic of · Associate Director
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
45%
Associate Director - Clinical Research Lead
Lilly · Gurgaon, Haryāna, India · Associate Director
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
Unmatched or unknown dimensions score exactly the same: 0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.