Boehringer Ingelheim

AD, Quality and Compliance (Gainesville, GA, United States, Georgia)

Gainesville, Georgia, United States Type not listed
Quality

Boehringer Ingelheim is the source of truth for this posting and owns the application process. We surface normalized context and market comparison you won't find on the original listing.

About this opportunity

Description

As an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, you will actively contribute to the discovery, development and delivery of our products to our patients and customers. Our global presence provides opportunity for all employees to collaborate internationally, offering visibility and opportunity to directly contribute to the companies' success. We realize that our strength and competitive advantage lie with our people. We support our employees in a number of ways to foster a healthy working environment, meaningful work, mobility, networking and work-life balance. Our competitive compensation and benefit programs reflect Boehringer Ingelheim's high regard for our employees.

The basic purpose of this position is to provide technical direction and serve as a subject matter expert (SME) for product disposition activities to assure that Quality systems and processes are in place.  Also, be an SME for the documentation of the deviation, root cause analysis, CAPA, and impact assessment of the event.  Responsible for implementing procedures to assure compliance with EU, USDA, and corporate requirements; and ensuring final investigation reports meet regulatory and BIAH requirements.

This position will indirectly support the Quality and Compliance department according to company policies and corporate business plans and to provide technical support to QA Release functions.  Participate and helps lead regulatory inspection.  This position also serves as a deputy (backup) to the Sr. Associate Director in the event of their absence.

Duties & Responsibilities

Responsible for tracking and reporting status of all action items on a routine basis to assure Quality systems are in place to support the business across sites during company acquisitions and divestures.

Assures all site processes are in place to support the business.  Review and approve laboratory and manufacturing investigations to ensure compliance with BIVI policies and applicable regulatory guidance.  Coordinate investigations across all functions within operations,ensure effective root cause analysis, and develop corrective and preventive actions for associated events relating to biological production operations and associated quality systems. Ensure timely completion of investigations per procedures and the implementation and completion of corrective and preventive actions.

Training:

1)  Completes all assigned training by target due dates as assigned by BIVI.

2) Assists in development of training plans and trains others, including training outside of area of responsibility.

3)  Assists as needed in development and maintenance of training curricula.

Indirectly supports the following Quality & Compliance activities as needed:

1)  Deviations/CAPA

2)  Change Control

3)  Regulatory Activities

4)  QA management activities, including staffing, budget, compensation, KPIs, strategic planning.

5)  Audits/Inspections

May have Management Responsibilities to include:

1)  Manages department expenses.

2)  Communicates staffing expectations to applicable QA staff.

3)  Develops assigned direct reports. t

4)  Identifies equipment/tools needed for QA Release.

5)  Provides input for performance reviews and compensation approvals.

6)  Performs data generation & provides reports/updates for Quality Management reviews

7)  Performs business and strategic planning for area of responsibility in alignment with Company objectives

Requirements

Bachelor's degree in a scientific discipline or relevant field.

A minimum of 10 years of strategic experience in QA systems and processes including deviation management within in a GMP regulated manufacturing facility or similar environment.

Experience must be inclusive of 6 years leading people, projects and leaders.

Preferred regulatory experience in FDA and/or EU regulated environment.

Sterile product manufacturing experience preferred.

#LI-KD1

Eligibility Requirements:

Must be legally authorized to work in the United States without restriction.

Must be willing to take a drug test and post-offer physical (if required)

Must be 18 years of age or older

]]>

Job details

Seniority
Not listed
Function
Quality
Therapeutic area
Not listed
Location
Gainesville, Georgia, United States
Employment type
Not listed

How this role compares

Computed from every other active Quality role in our database, not just this employer's listings.

We currently track 644 comparable Quality roles across 85 biopharma companies.

644Comparable roles tracked
597Currently active
85Companies hiring similar roles
45Countries represented

Salary context

110 of 644 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)

Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.

This roleSubject Not listed on this posting
Lowest disclosed · Technician - QC Laboratory · Lilly $13/hr – $29/hr (≈ $26,998–$60,507/yr)
Highest disclosed · Executive Director, QA Microbiology · Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (USA) $203,000/yr – $399,400/yr
Peer group range $43,753 – $301,200 (median $159,000)

Where these roles are based

Top locations among the 644 comparable roles

United States212
Ireland49
India45
China39
Singapore36
France29

+ 39 more countries

Seniority mix

309 of 644 peers have a known seniority level

Manager116
Senior97
Associate Director26
Director24
Associate23
Principal14
Senior Director7
Executive/VP1
Intern/Fellow/Postdoc1

Therapeutic area mix

0 of 644 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden

No peers with a known therapeutic area yet.

Similar opportunities

The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.

40%similar
Lilly Lebanon, Indiana, United States of America Principal
Same function Same country
40%similar
Lilly Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America Associate
Same function Same country
40%similar
Lilly Lebanon, Indiana, United States of America Principal
Same function Same country
40%similar
AbbVie North Chicago, IL Director
Same function Same country
40%similar
AbbVie North Chicago, IL Manager
Same function Same country
40%similar
AbbVie North Chicago, IL Director
Same function Same country

How we calculate "similar"

No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.

Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.

40%
Principal Scientist GMP Environmental Monitoring Lilly Medicine Foundry
Lilly · Lebanon, Indiana, United States of America · Principal
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
40%
Director, Clinical Quality Assurance
AbbVie · North Chicago, IL · Director
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
40%
Senior R&D Quality Officer, Product Development Quality Assurance
AbbVie · Irvine, CA · Senior
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
40%
Principal Scientist I/II, Study Quality and Compliance - Nonclinical Safety/Toxicology
Novartis · Cambridge (USA), United States · Principal
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
Unmatched or unknown dimensions score exactly the same: 0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.