【AstraZeneca】【Finance】Individual contributor, HTA manager
About this opportunity
■ 職務内容 / Job Description
Conduct CEA (cost effectiveness analysis) effectively and prepare strategic HTA (health technology assessment) materials in order to minimize price cuts for responsible products under the Official CEE (Cost Effectiveness Evaluation). Typical accountabilities are as follows: • Accomplish CEA according to the guidelines and generate plausible results in collaboration with internal and external people concerned (make a plan, collect necessary information, generate necessary data, conduct multiple analyses, and develop materials)• Prepare required materials and negotiate with C2H/MHLW in the official CEE process.• Make a suggestion to Pricing & Market access strategy in terms of HTA• Collect updated information about technical knowledge, HTA system, and leverage them for our activities
■ 応募資格(経験、資格等) / Qualification (Experience & Skill etc.)
【経験 / Experience】
＜必須 / Mandatory＞
• Experience of CEA
＜歓迎 / Nice to have＞
• Experience of CEE negotiation with C2H• Experience of working in a multi-national pharmaceutical company.
【資格 / License】
＜必須 / Mandatory＞
• Bachelor degree in relevant field (Marketing, Science, Economics or pharmacists)
＜歓迎 / Nice to have＞
• Pharmacist license• Medical license
【能力 / Skill-set】
＜必須 / Mandatory＞
• Knowledge of healthcare business, HTA, and pricing & reimbursement regulations in Japan.• Excellent interpersonal communication skills• Logical thinking • Problem resolution skills• Project management skills
＜歓迎 / Nice to have＞
• Experience in Real World Data analysis/Epidemiological research• Familiarity with operating in a global business• Statistical skills• High-level Excel skills
【語学 / Language】
＜必須 / Mandatory＞
日本語 Japanese：Fluent
英語 English：business-level
【勤務地 / Work Location】
Osaka or Tokyo
Date Posted
31-7月-2026
Closing Date
AstraZeneca embraces diversity and equality of opportunity. We are committed to building an inclusive and diverse team representing all backgrounds, with as wide a range of perspectives as possible, and harnessing industry-leading skills. We believe that the more inclusive we are, the better our work will be. We welcome and consider applications to join our team from all qualified candidates, regardless of their characteristics. We comply with all applicable laws and regulations on non-discrimination in employment (and recruitment), as well as work authorization and employment eligibility verification requirements.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Market Access role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 83 comparable Manager Market Access roles across 20 biopharma companies.
Salary context
23 of 83 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 83 comparable roles
+ 12 more countries
Seniority mix
83 of 83 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
26 of 83 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.