Associate Director, Quality Assurance APAC
About this opportunity
As the independent second line quality assurance function for R&D, our mission in Quality Assurance is to achieve enduring excellence in auditing, quality management, quality risk assessment and enhance the R&D quality mindset for the benefit of our patients.
The Associate Director Quality Assurance is responsible for:
Planning, leading, conducting, and reporting R&D GxP risk-based audits across GCP, GVP, GRP, Lab GCP, and GLP, with a focus on assessing emerging technologies, AI solutions, computerized systems, digital processes, and technology-enabled quality activities.
Delivery of proactive GxP inspection support and management
Management of significant CAPAs related to audit and/or inspection findings in collaboration with functions owning the issues.
Managing business relationships with defined stakeholder groups for the quality management activities (quality risk, issues, process etc.).
Responsibilities:
Audit
Plans, leads, conducts and reports audits in assigned GxP areas, and types e.g. investigator site audit, system or process audits and vendor audits, with particular focus where applicable on computerized systems, digital platforms, data integrity, technology-enabled processes and AI solutions.
Participate in and may lead directed (For Cause) audits.
Works with contract personnel or consultants to prepare, conduct and report outsourced audits
Service provider quality oversight
Provide quality oversight of service providers, including supplier qualification activities, gap assessments, and due diligence support, particularly where services involve digital systems, data platforms, AI-enabled tools, or regulated technology solutions.
CAPA
Assesses need for, and assists in development of CAPA plans, approves and monitors plans to completion
Inspection
Provides QA oversight and/or management of regulatory GxP inspections
Collaborates with Quality Assurance lead, to manage and prepare for regulatory inspections as assigned including providing training to the organisation as needed.
General Accountabilities
Ensures own tasks are performed to current practices and in accordance with company policies, standards, SOPs and guidelines
Promotes a culture of ethics, integrity and continuous improvement that focuses on delivering efficiencies and planned business benefits
Communicates effectively with QA colleagues and business stakeholders
Maintain knowledge of relevant regulatory expectations, industry trends, and evolving best practices related to GxP, data integrity and governance, computerized systems, digital health technologies, AI governance and quality risk management.
Leads training for colleagues and business stakeholders as required.
Involved in and may lead the development and/or revision of QA processes, projects and tools
Mentors QA colleagues
Act as a trusted quality partner to stakeholder by providing proactive and practical advice on GxP compliance, quality systems, digital risk, computerized systems quality, and the use of emerging technologies in regulated environments.
Support quality and compliance risk management for functional area using risk framework standards to define risk and develop mitigation recommendations
Travel expected
Requirements:
Essential
Degree-level education or equivalent experience in clinical development, quality management, data science, computer science, information technology, AI technology or a related discipline
Experience in one or more of the following areas: computerized systems, data integrity, digital technologies, AI-enabled solutions, IT quality, CSV/CSA, or technology risk in regulated environments
Excellent analytical, written and oral communications skills
Fluent in written and spoken English
High ethical standards, trustworthy, operating with absolute discretion
Strong collaborative, influencing and interpersonal
skills – curious to understand business environment
Skilled at managing & using technology
Ability to build effective professional networks with stakeholders across functions and geographies
Desirable
Experience in auditing or overseeing AI solutions, digital platforms, computerized systems, or other technology-enabled processes in regulated environments
Experience in computerized system validation (CSV), data governance, or IT quality
Experience in pharmaceuticals or a related industry
Project management experience
Experience in managing regulatory health authority GxP Inspections
Key Account management
Audit expertise
Date Posted
04-Ogo-2026
Closing Date
03-Sep-2026
AstraZeneca embraces diversity and equality of opportunity. We are committed to building an inclusive and diverse team representing all backgrounds, with as wide a range of perspectives as possible, and harnessing industry-leading skills. We believe that the more inclusive we are, the better our work will be. We welcome and consider applications to join our team from all qualified candidates, regardless of their characteristics. We comply with all applicable laws and regulations on non-discrimination in employment (and recruitment), as well as work authorization and employment eligibility verification requirements.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Quality role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 238 comparable Associate Director Quality roles across 55 biopharma companies.
Salary context
50 of 238 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 238 comparable roles
+ 22 more countries
Seniority mix
238 of 238 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
0 of 238 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
No peers with a known therapeutic area yet.
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.