Associate Director, PK Scientist/Clinical pharmacologist
About this opportunity
Provides strategic and broad team leadership on drug discovery, development projects and/or evaluation. Widely recognized as a strong team leader and/or expert from PK Science.
Key responsibilities: Defines team goals, or provides matrix leadership, aligns and provides input to departmentstrategy to project team or company initiative. Assumes responsibility for project, externalevaluation or initiative and builds a clear connection to department and company goals.Successfully leads or operationalizes key scientific/technical/development areas from thediscipline to advance department and company goals.May lead PKS sub-team(s) to generate, analyze, integrate data. Works with teams toidentify potential project gaps and identifies mitigation plan (eg, resource needs, strategicalignment)Champions and advances new science relevant for project/department goals.Completes all required organizational trainings and requirements according to corporatetimelines. Adhere in strict accord to the appropriate SOP and GxP guidelines.Leadership, Culture and Impact:May develop and lead innovative interdisciplinary team, and/or leads through matrix using a well-developed internal and external scientific network.Generates innovative strategy input and project concepts across multiplescientific/technical/development/evaluation domainsLinks scientific strategy with specific objectives in novel areas through flexible matrix communities and/or direct team leadership and empowerment. Conducts long-and mid-term planning to identify specific, measurable impact on team objectivesSkilled in collaboration across PKS-internal or external business partners. Utilizes established networks and builds new network connections to bring new knowledge into thedepartment/TM/BR/GDD and beyond.Essential requirements:PhD / Pharm.D. level scientist with relevant experience in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics or related biologic background10+ years in the pharmaceutical industry and experience in drug discovery, development or a relevant environment (e.g. Clinical Pharmacology or Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics).Knowledge of regulatory requirements and experience indealing with regulatory authorities and experienceconducting due diligence.Proficient with full range of techniques used in job and corearea. Working knowledge of tools and processes used indrug design and development.Extensive library research skills and knowledge of problemsolving techniquesExtensive and in-depth knowledge of scientific discipline andrelevant laboratory tools and procedures if responsible forlab associated activityGood understanding of management and training principlesSound and robust list of scientific publications and externalpresentations.Fluent oral and written Chinese and EnglishDesirable requirements:Extensive and in-depth knowledge of drug metabolism andpharmacokinetics including, pharmacology PK and PK/PDevaluation, Immunogenicity (for PTM roles), techniques,experience in working in project teams (preferably global)and knowledge of regulatory requirements.Demonstrated success of working in cross functional projectteams (preferably global) and sound awareness of recentdevelopments in drug development sciences.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 309 comparable Associate Director Clinical Development roles across 48 biopharma companies.
Salary context
66 of 309 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 309 comparable roles
+ 22 more countries
Seniority mix
309 of 309 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
24 of 309 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.